Insufficient Data
At least 3 years of filing history are required to project a trajectory.
Insufficient Data Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Insufficient Data

What does this mean?

Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.

Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Insufficient Data ↑
Overall
45
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Insufficient Data

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden — 45 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — — 18 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Yvonne Faison Board President —
Rafa Sardina Board President —
Alexander Walden Treasurer —
Don Franzen Secretary —
Daniel Carlin Board Member —
Zain Khan Board Member —
Chuck Ortner Board Member —
Paula Salvatore Board Member —
Matt Serletic Board Member —
JoAnn Tomminaga Board Member —
Yvonne Faison Board President —
Rafa Sardina Board President —
Alexander Walden Treasurer —
Don Franzen Secretary —
Daniel Carlin Board Member —
Judy Whitmore Board Member —
Zain Kahn Board Member —
Chuck Ortner Board Member —
Paula Salvatore Board Member —
Joann Tominaga Board Member —
Patricia McCauley Board Member —
Matt Serletic Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
YVONNE FAISON Board President —
ALEXANDER WALDEN Treasurer —
FON FRANZEN Secretary —
MITCHEL MOORE Board President —
DANIEL CARLIN Board Member —
DEBORAH CHASE Board Member —
ZAIN KHAN Board Member —
CHARLES ORTNER Board Member —
PAULA SALVATORE Board Member —
RAFA SARDINA Board Member —
JOANN TOMINAGA Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
45 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,424 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Insufficient Data

Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.