Insufficient Data
At least 3 years of filing history are required to project a trajectory.
Insufficient Data
Market
Archetype
Mechanical
Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint
Insufficient Data
What does this mean?
Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.
Institutional Health Scores
Overall
36
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
5
Score
Title
-
Institutions
-
Avg Revenue
-
Risk Profile
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Insufficient Data
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2024 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2023 | Hidden | Hidden | 93.8% | 36 | Governance-Stressed | Gov Risk |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2026
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERIN BUSTIN | EXECUTIVE DI | 97.9% of Rev | ||
| ERIN BUSTIN | EXECUTIVE DI | 93.8% of Rev | ||
| MARK A BERRY | Board Member | — | ||
| JON EDWARDS | Board Member | — | ||
| ROGER HENDERSON | Board Member | — | ||
| STEPHANIE LATIMER | Board Member | — | ||
| PJ MAHAFFEY | VICE PRESIDE | — | ||
| TAYLOR MARSHO | Board Member | — | ||
| CIGI MUCKLER | Treasurer | — | ||
| THERESA PAGLIAI | Board Member | — | ||
| JOHN ROMMEREIM | Board Member | — | ||
| MAURA STRASSBERG | Board President | — | ||
| LESLEY WRIGHT | Secretary | — | ||
| JON EDWARDS | Board Member | — | ||
| ROGER HENDERSON | Board Member | — | ||
| LUKE KOTZ | Treasurer | — | ||
| STEPHANIE LATIMER | Board Member | — | ||
| BRAD LINDBERG | Board Member | — | ||
| SKIP LOWE | Board Member | — | ||
| PJ MAHAFFEY | VICE PRESIDE | — | ||
| TAYLOR MARSHO | Board Member | — | ||
| JOHN ROMMEREIM | Board Member | — | ||
| MAURA STRASSBERG | Board President | — | ||
| HANNAH WILSON | Board Member | — | ||
| LESLEY WRIGHT | Secretary | — |
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown
Score breakdown
Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
36 / 100
Priority Review
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 85 other orgs in IA with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: program score sits 25 points below the peer median (5 vs. 30).
5-year trend: Insufficient Data
Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.
What's driving this score
- Comp-to-revenue ratio of 93.8% is well above the sector's 90th percentile (healthy band: 18–22%).
What would change this score
The two changes that would most improve this score:
- Reduce top-officer compensation from 93.8% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~40 points.
- Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.