Insufficient Data
At least 3 years of filing history are required to project a trajectory.
Insufficient Data Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Insufficient Data

What does this mean?

Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.

Institutional Health Scores
Overall
26
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Insufficient Data

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 39.9% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KIMBERLEY AHRENS Artistic Director 26.3% of Rev
CLAIRE WORRALL Executive Dir. 15.2% of Rev
DAVID KRAUSE Chairman
MELINDA COTTEN Secretary
WILLIAM MONTGOMERY Treasurer
CYNTHIA NOTT Board Member
RAVI GOPAL Board Member
JOSEPH LO Board Member
WILLIAM M SHEAFFER Board Member
DAVID STANLEY Board Member
TAMARA SUMMERS Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KIMBERLEY AHRENS Artistic Director 21.6% of Rev
MIGUEL CANTU-THRU 524 Executive Dir. 9.9% of Rev
CLAIRE WORRALL-FROM 524 GENERAL MANAGER 8.4% of Rev
DAVID KRAUSE Chairman
MELINDA COTTEN Secretary
WILLIAM MONTGOMERY Treasurer
CYNTHIA NOTT Board Member
RAVI GOPAL Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Melinda Cotton Secretary
David Krause Board President
Cynthia Nott Board Member
William Montogomery Treasurer
Ravi Gopal Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
26 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 132 other orgs in TX with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 32 points below the peer median (0 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Insufficient Data

Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 39.9% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~36 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.