Insufficient Data
At least 3 years of filing history are required to project a trajectory.
Insufficient Data
Market
Archetype
Mechanical
Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint
Insufficient Data
What does this mean?
Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Insufficient Data ↑
Overall
50
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
30
Score
Title
-
Institutions
-
Avg Revenue
-
Risk Profile
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Insufficient Data
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2024 | Hidden | Hidden | 2.4% | 50 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2023 | — | — | — | 43 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2025
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HEATHER WOODS | Board President | 2.4% of Rev | ||
| MIKE KUJAWA | Executive Director | — | ||
| PHILLIP TELLING | Board President | — | ||
| SARA BIEGEL | Treasurer | — | ||
| SHANNON MOYLE | Board Member | — | ||
| DIANA KUJAWA | Board Member | — | ||
| BILL DAILY | Board Member | — | ||
| MIKE KUJAWA SR | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIKE KUJAWA | Executive Director | — | ||
| PHILLIP TELLING | Board President | — | ||
| HEATHER WOODS | Board President | — | ||
| SARA BIEGEL | Treasurer | — | ||
| SHANNON MOYLE | Secretary | — | ||
| DIANA KUJAWA | OFFICER | — | ||
| ANDREW KUJAWA | OFFICER | — | ||
| BILL DAILY | OFFICER | — |
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown
Score breakdown
Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
50 / 100
Developing
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 26 other orgs in MT with NTEE prefix A2.
Most-divergent component: governance score sits 20 points below the peer median (58 vs. 78).
5-year trend: Insufficient Data
Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.
What's driving this score
- Comp-to-revenue ratio of 2.4% sits within the sector's healthy band (18–22%).
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.