Insufficient Data
At least 3 years of filing history are required to project a trajectory.
Insufficient Data
Market
Archetype
Mechanical
Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint
Insufficient Data
What does this mean?
Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Insufficient Data ↓
Overall
51
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
65
Score
Program
30
Score
Title
-
Institutions
-
Avg Revenue
-
Risk Profile
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Insufficient Data
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2024 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2023 | Hidden | Hidden | — | 51 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2022 | — | — | 7.8% | 53 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2026
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kathryn McSwain | Board President | 5.5% of Rev | ||
| Jimmy Morgan | Board Member | 3.0% of Rev | ||
| Garrett Kling | Treasurer | 2.8% of Rev | ||
| Jacqueline Benson | Board President | 2.7% of Rev | ||
| Katherine Vitaro | Secretary | — |
Tax year 2025
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KATHRYN MCSWAIN | Board President | 5.1% of Rev | ||
| GARRETT KLING | Treasurer | 4.2% of Rev | ||
| JACQUELINE BENSON | Board President | 2.1% of Rev | ||
| KATHERINE VITARO | Secretary | — |
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KATHRYN MCSWAIN | Board President | 3.5% of Rev | ||
| GARRETT KLING | Treasurer | 1.8% of Rev | ||
| JACQUELINE BENSON | Board President | 0.6% of Rev | ||
| KATHERINE VITARO | Secretary | 0.2% of Rev |
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown
Score breakdown
Financial resilience
65 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
51 / 100
Stable
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 245 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 23 points above the peer median (65 vs. 42).
5-year trend: Insufficient Data
Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.
What's driving this score
- No individual risk drivers stand out. Overall score reflects component balance, not any single signal.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.