Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
29
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 19.9% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 9.4% 44 Fragile Recovery
2021 10.2% 42 Fragile Recovery
2020 43.3% 38 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2019 14.0% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 14.4% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2017 15.8% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 17.9% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 16.5% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 17.2% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 11.9% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2012 18.2% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 18.9% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2010 15.6% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ALEXANDER VAN ALSTYNE Artistic Director 15.7% of Rev
ROBIN FULLER Board President
STEVE TROUNDAY Board President
VICTORIA JAKUBOWSKI Treasurer
MICHAEL PENNINGTON Board Member
PAUL THOMSEN Board Member
WENDY FIRESTONE Board Member
VIRGINIA KERSEY Board Member
SANDY GORDON Board Member
YVETTE MYERS Board Member
DEE DEE DESIDERIO-SHULA Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Alexander Van Alstyne Artistic Director 12.8% of Rev
Robin Fuller Board President
Steve Trounday Board President
Victoria Jakubowski Treasurer
Michael Pennington Board Member
Paul Thomsen Board Member
Wendy Firestone Board Member
Virginia Kersey Board Member
Sandy Gordon Board Member
Yvette Myers Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Alexander Van Alstyne Executive Director 13.6% of Rev
Robin Fuller Board President
Steve Trounday Board President
Vicky Jakubowski Treasurer
Michael Pennington Board Member
Paul Thompsen Board Member
Darci Watson Board Member
Ginnie Kersey Board Member
Dee Dee Desiderio Schula Board Member
Helen O'Brien Board Member
Yvette Myers Board Member
Kelly Wilmoth Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Alexander Van Alstyne Executive Director 12.6% of Rev
Darci Watson Board Member
Ginnie Kersey Board Member
Dee Dee Desiderio Schula Board Member
Helen O'Brien Board Member
Yvette Myers Board Member
Kelly Wilmoth Board Member
Robin Fuller Board President
Steve Trounday Board President
Vicky Jakubowski Treasurer
Michael Pennington Board Member
Paul Thopson Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
29 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 27 other orgs in NV with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 26 points below the peer median (5 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.