Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
51
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 — — 4.9% 51 Fragile Recovery
2023 — — 9.3% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 — — 6.5% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 — — 1.9% 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2020 — — 14.8% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — 13.0% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — 10.1% 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 — — 2.9% 45 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — 12.4% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 — — 18.6% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 — — 11.3% 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 — — 11.1% 42 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — 11.7% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2011 — — 13.6% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Amy Heald Executive Director 3.0% of Rev
Amy Heald Executive Director 0.7% of Rev
John Tozzi Board President —
Edie Cartwright Board President —
Lloyd Rogers Board President —
Holly Walton-Buchanan Secretary —
Patrick Ellingsworth Treasurer —
Les Cohen Board Member —
Ron Luschar Board Member —
Jennifer Smith Board Member —
Barbara Fox Board Member —
Eric Lovejoy Board Member —
Christopher Piekarz Board Member —
Robert Seale Board Member —
Judith Simpson Board Member —
John Tozzi Board President —
Edie Cartwright Board President —
Cleta Dillard Board President —
Holly Walton-Buchanan Secretary —
Patrick Ellingsworth Treasurer —
Les Cohen Board Member —
Ron Luschar Board Member —
Gail McAllister Board Member —
Lloyd Rogers Board Member —
Jennifer Smith Board Member —
Kay Dean Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
THOMAS MAYES Executive Director 4.5% of Rev
THOMAS MAYES Executive Director 4.4% of Rev
CLETA DILLARD Board President —
FRED JAKOLAT Secretary —
TASHA REISZ Treasurer —
AMY BOOTH Board Member —
KAY DEAN Board Member —
MARK MACDONALD Board Member —
GAIL MCALLISTER Board Member —
LLOYD ROGERS Board Member —
JUDY SIMPSON Board Member —
WILLIAM DOUGLASS Board Member —
JANE NICHOLS Board Member —
RENEE JACOBS Board Member —
HOLLY WALTON-BUCHANAN Board Member —
JENNIFER SMITH Board President —
JOHN TOZZI Board President —
CLETA DILLARD Board President —
FRED JAKOLAT Secretary —
KAY DEAN Treasurer —
EDIE CARTWRIGHT Board Member —
LES COHEN Board Member —
MARK MACDONALD Board Member —
GAIL MCALLISTER Board Member —
LLOYD ROGERS Board Member —
RON LUSCHAR Board Member —
RENEE JACOBS Board Member —
HOLLY WALTON-BUCHANAN Board Member —
PAT ELLINGSWORTH Board Member —
JENNIFER SMITH Board President —
JOHN TOZZI Board President —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
51 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 43 other orgs in NV with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 27 points above the peer median (60 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 32 → 51 over 5 years (improving by 19 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.