Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↓
Overall
39
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 14.5% 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 Hidden Hidden 12.8% 46 Financially Distressed Recovery
2021 — — 23.0% 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2020 — — — 50 Financially Distressed Recovery
2019 — — 17.1% 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 — — 17.1% 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 — — 11.1% 56 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 — — 13.8% 53 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — 12.2% 51 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — 15.9% 40 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2013 — — 17.1% 47 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — 9.7% 46 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KATE BIDEAUX Board Member —
CATHAY CHRISTENSEN Board Member —
LINDA DURBANO Board Member —
AARON FRITZ Board Member —
DOUG FULLERTON Board Member —
ERICH GOECKERITZ Board Member —
CAMERON HUBBARD VICE PRESIDE —
DAVID ISAACS Board Member —
BROOKE KARRINGTON Board Member —
MORGAN KEYES Board Member —
ALAN LUNT Board Member —
MANDIANNE ORTON Board Member —
AVALINE PETERSEN Board Member —
JILL SJOBLOM Secretary —
SUE WILKERSON Board President —
PATRICK POCE EXECUTIVE DI —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JUDI AMSEL ADVISORY MEM —
DELORES BERTAGNOLLI Board Member —
BOYD BINGHAM ADVISORY MEM —
SHERIE CHARLESWORTH Board Member —
COREY COMBE ADVISORY MEM —
KEARSTON CUTRUBUS Board Member —
MERI DECARIA ADVISORY MEM —
AARON FRITZ Board Member —
DOUG FULLERTON Board Member —
KATHY HANCHETT ADVISORY MEM —
ADAM HENSLEY Board Member —
STEVE KAUFMAN Board Member —
MORGAN KEYES Board Member —
LORA KIER Board Member —
SHARON MARKOS Board Member —
LISA MURPHY Board Member —
BRENT PARKIN Board Member —
NICK PERRY Board Member —
REGGIE PETERSON Board Member —
STEVE POORMAN ADVISORY MEM —
COLLETTE TORGHELE ADVISORY MEM —
CURTIS WAHLEN ADVISORY MEM —
RICHARD WHITE ADVISORY MEM —
SUE WILKERSON Board Member —
SUE WILKERSON Board Member —
PATRICK POCE EXECUTIVE DI —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JUDI AMSEL ADVISORY MEM —
DELORES BERTAGNOLLI Board Member —
BOYD BINGHAM ADVISORY MEM —
SHERIE CHARLESWORTH Board Member —
COREY COMBE ADVISORY MEM —
KEARSTON CUTRUBUS Board Member —
MERI DECARIA ADVISORY MEM —
AARON FRITZ Board Member —
DOUG FULLERTON Board Member —
KATHY HANCHETT ADVISORY MEM —
ADAM HENSLEY Board Member —
STEVE KAUFMAN Board Member —
MORGAN KEYES Board Member —
LORA KIER Board Member —
REED LOVELAND Board Member —
SHARON MARKOS Board Member —
LISA MURPHY Board Member —
BRENT PARKIN Board Member —
NICK PERRY Board Member —
REGGIE PETERSON Board Member —
STEVE POORMAN ADVISORY MEM —
COLLETTE TORGHELE ADVISORY MEM —
CURTIS WAHLEN ADVISORY MEM —
RICHARD WHITE ADVISORY MEM —
SUE WILKERSON Board Member —
PATRICK POCE EXECUTIVE DI —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
39 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 57 other orgs in UT with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 35 points below the peer median (25 vs. 60).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.