Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
35
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 43.4% 40 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 37 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHERYL ABSHER VICE PRESIDE
KIM MCDANNEL Secretary
JEFF MENEESE Board Member
JEFF MILLER Board President
JUSTIN NEHRKORN Board Member
JOIANNA PHELPS Board Member
MARCELLA TYLER Board Member
ASHTON WEBB Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
APRIL MITTER Board Member 23.4% of Rev
KIMBERLY MCDANNEL Secretary 9.5% of Rev
JEFF MILLER Board President
CHERYL ABSHER VICE PRESIDE
JOSH BENSON Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
35 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 196 other orgs in IL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 21 points below the peer median (15 vs. 36).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.