Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↓
Overall
40
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 — — — 40 Fragile Recovery
2023 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 — — 27.8% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 — — — 37 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 33.6% 44 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2017 — — — 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 — — — 53 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — — 47 Fragile Recovery
2013 — — — 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 — — — 47 Fragile Recovery
2011 — — — 39 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHALYSE MEASOM Parent Board —
STEVE BROADBENT Treasurer —
KARLA AXTELL Board Member —
KIMBERLY LOTT Secretary —
WENDI HASSAN Board Member —
SUE SORENSON Board Member —
HEATHER JENSEN Board President —
MILES JENSEN Board Member —
BRAUN KHAN Board President —
AMY HANSEN ATKINSON Board Member —
LYNDON LOOSLE Board Member —
BILL PETERSON Board Member —
DAVE GILBERT Board Member —
BONNIE SLADE Board Member —
LESLIE TIMMONS Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JARON PUTNAM Artistic Director 14.4% of Rev
JAN JENKINS Board Member 10.0% of Rev
CRAIG JESSOP Board President —
STEVE BROADBENT Treasurer —
MIKE BANKHEAD Board Member —
KIMBERLY LOTT Secretary —
WENDI HASSAN Board Member —
HEATHER JENSEN Board President —
MILES JENSEN Board Member —
BRAUN KHAN Board President —
DOUG LEMON Strategic Plan —
LYNDON LOOSLE Board Member —
SUSAN JOHNSON Parent Board —
RACHEL NARDO Board Member —
DAVE GILBERT Board Member —
LESLIE TIMMONS Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JARON PUTNAM Artistic Director 7.7% of Rev
JAN JENKINS Board Member 5.3% of Rev
Jan Jenkins Board Member 4.0% of Rev
LESLIE TIMMONS Board Member 2.5% of Rev
Leslie Timmons Board Member 2.0% of Rev
Jaron Putman Artistic Director 1.5% of Rev
CRAIG JESSOP Board Member —
STEVE BROADBENT Board Member —
MIKE BANKHEAD Board Member —
CORY EVANS Board Member —
WENDI HASSAN Board Member —
HEATHER JENSEN Board Member —
MILES JENSEN Board Member —
BRAUN KHAN Board Member —
DOUG LEMON Board Member —
LYNDON LOOSLE Board Member —
NICHOLAS MORRISON Board Member —
RACHEL NARDO Board Member —
SHARI NIELSEN Board Member —
LYNN THOMAS Board Member —
TAMI VAN DUSEN Board Member —
Craig Jessop Board President —
Steve Broadbent Treasurer —
Doug Lemon Strategic Plann —
Braun Khan Board Member —
Wendi Hassan Board Member —
Lynn Thomas Board Member —
Miles Jensen Board Member —
Cory Evens Board Member —
Tami Van Dusen Board Member —
Nicholas Morrison Board Member —
Janis Morales ```` —
Mike Bankhead Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
40 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 114 other orgs in UT with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 16 points below the peer median (30 vs. 46).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).
  2. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.