Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
51
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 1.7% 51 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — 2.0% 39 Financially Distressed Recovery
2021 — — 6.0% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 — — 3.2% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2019 — — 6.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 — — 1.6% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2017 — — 2.1% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2016 — — 5.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 — — 2.1% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2014 — — 2.0% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 — — 5.3% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 — — 3.4% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Derryl Yeager Board President —
Ralph Petty Board Member —
Annie Van Alstyne Executive Director —
Heather Osmond Board Member —
Karen Standing Board Member —
Kristy Olsen Board Member —
Darren Reid Board Member —
Erin Reid Diector —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Tori Lima Board Member —
Lori Gee Board Member —
Karen Standing Board Member —
Heather Osmond Board Member —
Marlies Burns Board Member —
Ralph Petty Board Member —
Annie Van Alstyne Executive Director —
Derryl Yeager Board President —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Derryl Yeager Board President 3.4% of Rev
Lori Gee Board Member —
Heather Osmond Board Member —
David Eaton Board Member —
Marlies Burns Board Member —
Tori Lima Board Member —
Annie VanAlystyne Executive Director —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Derryl Yeager Board President 3.4% of Rev
Annie VanAlystyne Executive Director 3.3% of Rev
Marlies Burns Board Member —
Tori Lima Board Member —
David Easton Board Member —
Ralph Petty Board Member —
Lori Gee Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
51 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 14 other orgs in UT with NTEE prefix A3.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 35 points below the peer median (40 vs. 75).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.