Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
35
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 1.4% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 1.7% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 0.6% 41 Fragile Recovery
2020 2.7% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 1.3% 39 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 1.3% 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 1.2% 41 Fragile Recovery
2016 1.5% 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 1.6% 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 1.4% 49 Fragile Recovery
2013 1.7% 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 1.6% 45 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2011 1.9% 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SCOTT ANDERSON Artistic Director 0.7% of Rev
KEVIN M SMITH C.E.O. 0.6% of Rev
JOSEPH SMITH Vice President 0.5% of Rev
GARY CAHOON Treasurer 0.5% of Rev
JONATHAN HAFEN CHAIRMAN
ZACHARY RENSTROM Board Member
SUE COX Board Member
ROBERT SIMMONS Board Member
ANDREW MARTIN COX Board Member
DAVE PUGSLEY Board Member
MARGARET ARCHIBALD Board Member
LISA HOLM Board President
STACIE SHURTLIFF VICE CHAIRMAN
GIL ALMQUIST Board Member
JEFF MILLER Board Member
DARRIN WINN Board Member
STEPHANIE FINK Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SCOTT ANDERSON Artistic Director 0.8% of Rev
KEVIN M SMITH C.E.O. 0.7% of Rev
JONATHAN HAFEN CHAIRMAN
ZACHARY RENSTROM Board Member
SUE COX Board Member
ROBERT SIMMONS Board Member
ANDREW MARTIN COX Board Member
DAVE PUGSLEY Board Member
MARGARET ARCHIBALD Board Member
LEW CRAMER Board Member
LISA HOLM Board President
STACIE SHURTLIFF VICE CHAIRMAN
GIL ALMQUIST Board Member
MARCIA WADE Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SCOTT ANDERSON Artistic Director 0.7% of Rev
KEVIN M SMITH C.E.O. 0.7% of Rev
JONATHAN HAFEN CHAIRMAN
ZACHARY RENSTROM Board Member
SUE COX Board Member
ROBERT SIMMONS Board Member
ANDREW MARTIN COX Board Member
RICKI CHAMBERS Board Member
DAVE PUGSLEY Board Member
VICKY WILSON Board Member
MARGARET ARCHIBALD Board Member
LEW CRAMER Board Member
LISA HOLM Board President
DEAN COX Board Member
STACIE SHURTLIFF VICE CHAIRMAN
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
35 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 81 other orgs in UT with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 33 points below the peer median (0 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.