Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
40
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 7.3% 40 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 — — 7.2% 44 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 5.5% 42 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 21.1% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 — — 7.4% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 — — 9.3% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 — — 7.0% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 — — 7.5% 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2015 — — — 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 — — — 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 — — — 39 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — — 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TESSA VASCHEL Past Exec. Dir. 3.8% of Rev
KRISTIN WOJCIECHOWSKI Executive Dir. 3.5% of Rev
GABRIEL GORDON Board Member —
JORDAN HARRISON Board President —
BRUCE JENSEN Board Member —
BRAD FARMER Treasurer —
DAWN BRANDVOLD Board Member —
GREG SANDERS Board Member —
DAVE THOMAS Board Member —
SPENCER WHIPPLE Board Member —
ZELVA GOODRICH Board Member —
NANCY GEORGE Board President —
ROSS MARSHALL Board Member —
DON WILHELM Board Member —
LAURA BENGE Board Member —
COLLEEN MEWING Secretary —
SHELLY VAN NOY Board Member —
TERI COOPER Board President —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TESSA VASCHEL Executive Dir. 6.6% of Rev
HERMAN RAIFF Board President —
JORDAN HARRISON Board President —
JEFF DAVIS Secretary —
BRAD FARMER Treasurer —
DAWN BRANDVOLD Board President —
BETTINA SMITH-EDMONDSON Board Member —
TERI COOPER Board Member —
ZELVA GOODRICH Board Member —
JAMES BARLOW Board Member —
NANCY GEORGE Board Member —
ROSS MARSHALL Board Member —
SHELLY HOLT Board Member —
LAURA BENGE Board Member —
COLLEEN MEWING Board Member —
SHELLY VAN NOY Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TESSA VASCHEL Executive Dir. 6.9% of Rev
HERMAN RAIFF Board President —
JORDAN HARRISON Board President —
JEFF DAVIS Secretary —
BRAD FARMER Treasurer —
DAWN BRANDVOLD Board Member —
BARRY SANDERSON Board Member —
TERI COOPER Board Member —
DIXIE CLAYBROOK Board Member —
ZELVA GOODRICH Board Member —
JAMES BARLOW Board Member —
TREVOR GILSON Board Member —
SHELLY HOLT Board Member —
LAURA BENGE Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TESSA VASCHEL Executive Dir. 6.4% of Rev
VALERIE DAVIS Board Member —
LAURA STEPHENS Board Member —
BRAD FARMER Board Member —
TREVOR GILSON Board Member —
SHELLY HOLT Board Member —
CHAD LARSEN Board Member —
HERMAN RAIFF Board President —
ZELVA GOODRICH Board President —
DIXIE CLAYBROOK Secretary —
JAMES BARLOW Treasurer —
DAWN BRANDVOLD Board Member —
BARRY SANDERSON Board Member —
TERI COOPER Board Member —
CLINT MORRIS Board Member —
JORDAN HARRISON Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
40 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 114 other orgs in UT with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 31 points below the peer median (15 vs. 46).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.