Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
40
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 7.3% 40 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 7.2% 44 Fragile Recovery
2021 5.5% 42 Fragile Recovery
2020 21.1% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 7.4% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 9.3% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 7.0% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 7.5% 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2015 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 39 Fragile Recovery
2012 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TESSA VASCHEL Past Exec. Dir. 3.8% of Rev
KRISTIN WOJCIECHOWSKI Executive Dir. 3.5% of Rev
GABRIEL GORDON Board Member
JORDAN HARRISON Board President
BRUCE JENSEN Board Member
BRAD FARMER Treasurer
DAWN BRANDVOLD Board Member
GREG SANDERS Board Member
DAVE THOMAS Board Member
SPENCER WHIPPLE Board Member
ZELVA GOODRICH Board Member
NANCY GEORGE Board President
ROSS MARSHALL Board Member
DON WILHELM Board Member
LAURA BENGE Board Member
COLLEEN MEWING Secretary
SHELLY VAN NOY Board Member
TERI COOPER Board President

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TESSA VASCHEL Executive Dir. 6.6% of Rev
HERMAN RAIFF Board President
JORDAN HARRISON Board President
JEFF DAVIS Secretary
BRAD FARMER Treasurer
DAWN BRANDVOLD Board President
BETTINA SMITH-EDMONDSON Board Member
TERI COOPER Board Member
ZELVA GOODRICH Board Member
JAMES BARLOW Board Member
NANCY GEORGE Board Member
ROSS MARSHALL Board Member
SHELLY HOLT Board Member
LAURA BENGE Board Member
COLLEEN MEWING Board Member
SHELLY VAN NOY Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TESSA VASCHEL Executive Dir. 6.9% of Rev
HERMAN RAIFF Board President
JORDAN HARRISON Board President
JEFF DAVIS Secretary
BRAD FARMER Treasurer
DAWN BRANDVOLD Board Member
BARRY SANDERSON Board Member
TERI COOPER Board Member
DIXIE CLAYBROOK Board Member
ZELVA GOODRICH Board Member
JAMES BARLOW Board Member
TREVOR GILSON Board Member
SHELLY HOLT Board Member
LAURA BENGE Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TESSA VASCHEL Executive Dir. 6.4% of Rev
VALERIE DAVIS Board Member
LAURA STEPHENS Board Member
BRAD FARMER Board Member
TREVOR GILSON Board Member
SHELLY HOLT Board Member
CHAD LARSEN Board Member
HERMAN RAIFF Board President
ZELVA GOODRICH Board President
DIXIE CLAYBROOK Secretary
JAMES BARLOW Treasurer
DAWN BRANDVOLD Board Member
BARRY SANDERSON Board Member
TERI COOPER Board Member
CLINT MORRIS Board Member
JORDAN HARRISON Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
40 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 81 other orgs in UT with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.