Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
27
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 50.1% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 51 Fragile Recovery
2021 45 Fragile Recovery
2020 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2019 39 Fragile Recovery
2018 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 45 Fragile Recovery
2015 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 51 Fragile Recovery
2011 49 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BRANDON HANSEN Board Member
MARY ANN SUMMERS Board President
EMILY BUCKLEY Treasurer
MARTA DeBERRARD Board President
EMILY GEERTSEN Board Member
JANESE MICKELSON Secretary
STEPHANY JENKINS Board Member
AMANDA MCBRIDE Board Member
ELIZABETH ANDERSON Board President
ALEXA SAND Board Member
KAREN FILIMOEHALA Board Member
PAIGE WALDRON Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JAIME LINDLEY Board Member
BRANDON HANSEN Board Member
MARY ANN SUMMERS Board President
EMILY BUCKLEY Treasurer
MARTA DeBERRARD Board Member
SANDY EMILE Board Member
AMY ANDERSON Board President
ELIZABETH ANDERSON Board President
SHANDA BALDWIN Board Member
KAREN FILIMOEHALA Board President
SANDRA MCALLISTER Board Member
DAVID PERRY Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
27 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 82 other orgs in UT with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 17 points below the peer median (15 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 39 → 27 over 5 years (declining by 12 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 50.1% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~40 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.