Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
37
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 4.2% 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2022 5.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 5.2% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2020 6.4% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 5.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 2.4% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2017 3.0% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2016 3.5% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2015 3.3% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2014 2.9% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2013 3.4% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2012 4.0% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2011 4.1% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
FELICIA BACA Board Member 4.7% of Rev
JEFF DRIGGS Board Member 0.0% of Rev
CAITLIN TURSIC Treasurer 0.0% of Rev
HANNAH NIELSEN Board Member 0.0% of Rev
SUSAN KOLES RICKMAN Board Member 0.0% of Rev
LANA TAYLOR Board Member 0.0% of Rev
TRAVIS ENGLISH Board President 0.0% of Rev
GABRIELLA HUGGINS Board Member
CUAUHTEMOC SANDOVAL Secretary
KATHY DAVIS Board Member
EUGENIE JAFFE Board Member
MATTHEW COLES Board President
IGNACIO ROSENBERG Board Member
RYAN CANTER Board Member
SABRINA MARTINEZ Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
FELICIA BACA Board Member 3.7% of Rev
TORLE NENBEE Board Member
ERIKA HILL Board Member
SONALI LOOMBA Board Member
THOMAS KESSINGER Board Member
JOSANNE GLASS Board Member
MATTHEW CASTILLO Board Member
ANNIE DAYTON Board Member
AYANNA ALLEN Board Member
RICHARD TAYLOR Board Member
ANDREA ASHDOWN Board Member
KATHY DAVIS Board Member
KATHERINE POTTER Board Member
SARAH LONGORIA Board Member
CALE NEWHOUSE Treasurer
SUSAN KOLES RICKMAN Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
FELICIA BACA Board Member 3.6% of Rev
SONALI LOOMBA Board Member
TORLE NENBEE Board Member
SUSAN KOLES RICKMAN Board Member
SARAH LONGORIA Board Member
JOSANNE GLASS Board Member
NICO DICOU Board Member
ERIKA HILL Board Member
LARRY COHEN Board Member
ANDREA ASHDOWN Board Member
KATHERINE POTTER Board Member
ANNIE DAYTON Board Member
KATHY DAVIS Board Member
DAVE MORTENSEN Board Member
MATTHEW CASTILLO Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
FELICIA BACA Executive Director 3.4% of Rev
JARED JONES Board Member
KANIKA WELCH Board Member
KATHERINE POTTER Board Member
LARRY COHEN Board Member
EFREN CORADO GARCIA Board Member
ANNIE DAYTON Board Member
MATTHEW CASTILLO Treasurer
LEAH LANGAN Board Member
DAVE MORTENSEN Board Member
ANDREA ASHDOWN Board Member
STEVE BARTH Board Member
KATHY DAVIS Board Member
ERIKA HILL Board Member
SUSAN KOLES RICKMAN Board Member
TORLE NENBEE Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
37 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 82 other orgs in UT with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 30 points above the peer median (60 vs. 30).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.