Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
36
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden 29.1% 36 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2023 16.8% 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 10.2% 48 Fragile Recovery
2021 16.8% 45 Fragile Recovery
2020 10.9% 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 14.0% 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 10.6% 42 Fragile Recovery
2017 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2015 23.9% 41 Fragile Gov Risk
2014 12.7% 42 Fragile Recovery
2013 29.2% 40 Fragile Recovery
2012 32.5% 36 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JULIE RICHARD Executive Director 7.9% of Rev
LIZ GREGG BUSINESS MANAGER 5.0% of Rev
BRUCE PEEK CHAIRMAN
MELISSA PONTIKES VICE CHAIRMAN
JOAN ROBERTS Secretary
GWEN ORTMEYER Treasurer
AMY LIGHT Board Member
ISABEL SIMMER Board Member
CHUCK SPENCE Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
VINCE FAZIO Board Member 5.7% of Rev
LIZ GREGG BUSINESS MANAGER 4.2% of Rev
LIZ GREGG BUSINESS MANAGER 4.2% of Rev
VINCE FAZIO Board Member 3.1% of Rev
KATH GILLIAM Board Member
CHUCK SPENCE Board President
HOLLI PLOOG Board President
JOAN ROBERTS Secretary
ALLISON RAE NICHOLS Board Member
ISABEL SIMMER Board Member
LEWIS GUTHRIE Board Member
GWEN ORTMEYER Treasurer
AMY LIGHT Board Member
BRUCE PEEK Board Member
KATH GILLIAM Board Member
CHUCK SPENCE Board President
HOLLI PLOOG Board President
JOAN ROBERTS Secretary
ALLISON RAE NICHOLS Board Member
ISABEL SIMMER Board Member
LEWIS GUTHRIE Board Member
GWEN ORTMEYER Treasurer
AMY LIGHT Board Member
BRUCE PEEK Board Member
JULIE RICHARD Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
36 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 12 other orgs in AZ with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 33 points above the peer median (60 vs. 27).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

Overall score has gone from 38 → 36 over 5 years (declining by 2 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 29.1% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~14 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.