Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
43
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 15.2% 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 9.3% 54 Fragile Recovery
2021 15.2% 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 11.0% 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 10.1% 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 12.8% 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 12.2% 49 Fragile Recovery
2016 13.2% 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2015 19.1% 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 16.1% 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 14.3% 49 Fragile Recovery
2012 25.2% 42 Fragile Gov Risk
2011 16.6% 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Janet Green Executive Director 11.9% of Rev
Judy Stern Board Member
Michael Reed Board Member
Marlene Rausch-Phinney Secretary
Muriel Stone Johnson Board Member
Yuna Kang Board Member
Fran Dickman Board Member
Ben Taylor Board Member
Cheryl Mandala Treasurer
Charlotte Smith Board Member
Michael Maas Board President
Dominique van de Stadt Board President
Mort Scult Board Member
Omer Bloyd Board Member
Lynda Barber Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Janet Green Executive Director 11.9% of Rev
Muriel Stone Johnson Board Member
Judy Stern Board Member
Michael Reed Board Member
Ben Taylor Board Member
Yuna Kang Board Member
Fran Dickman Board Member
Allan Winston Board Member
Marlene Rausch-Phinney Secretary
Cheryl Mandala Treasurer
Charlotte Smith Board Member
Michael Maas Board President
Dominique van de Stadt Board President
Amanda Chua Board Member
Omer Bloyd Board Member
Lynda Barber Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Janet Green Executive Director 11.9% of Rev
Michael Maas Board President
Charlotte Smith Secretary
Cheryl Mandala Treasurer
Dominique van de Stadt Board President
Lynda Barber Board Member
Omer Bloyd Board Member
Amanda Chua Board Member
Claire Harris Board Member
Marlene Rausch-Phinney Board Member
Michael Reed Board Member
Judy Stern Board Member
Muriel Stone Johnson Board Member
Ben Taylor Board Member
Allan Winston Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
43 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 118 other orgs in AZ with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 13 points above the peer median (45 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

Overall score has gone from 52 → 43 over 5 years (declining by 9 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.