Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
41
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 14.4% 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 48 Fragile Recovery
2021 49 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOSHUA COLLIER Artistic Director 17.6% of Rev
ELLEN TROTTIER Treasurer
RUSS MCCOLMAN Board President
FRANK SPEZZANO Board Member
BARBARA WHITE Board Member
SUSAN GAGE Board Member
AMBER NARAMORE Secretary
MANUEL BALDERAS Board Member
JEAN SEELER-GIFFORD Board Member
KEISHA LUCE Board Member
WHITNEY SANDERFER-SMITH Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JEFF HAYLON Board President
RUSS MCCOLMAN Board President
FRANK SPEZZANO Board Member
BARBARA WHITE Secretary
JOSHUA COLLIER Board Member
CHRISTOPHER SZCZERBA Treasurer
TRICIA WELCH Board Member
MICHAEL SHANK Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
41 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 6 other orgs in VT with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 17 points above the peer median (40 vs. 23).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.