Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
31
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 19.4% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 0.8% 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2021 11.0% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 9.3% 44 Fragile Recovery
2019 5.4% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 10.6% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 8.8% 44 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 5.7% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 9.8% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 12.8% 39 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 13.4% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2012 12.8% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 13.8% 21 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JULIO CESAR MORALES Executive Director 0.7% of Rev
KIRA DIXON-WEINSTEIN Board President
DANNY VINIK Board President
LUIS SOTO CARRILLO Secretary
JUSTIN MARTINEZ Treasurer
JOHN BURCHER Board Member
ANTHONY J CANCHOLA Board Member
SAMUEL IRELAND Board Member
E COURTNEY JOHNSON Board Member
PABLO KYRIAKIS Board Member
LAUREN PEW Board Member
EVIE STEFENSON-MARQUART Board Member
DAVID TAYLOR Board Member
MICHAEL BRADFORD Board Member
DAPHNE SRINIVASAN Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LAURA COPELIN Executive Director 7.0% of Rev
KATE GREEN Executive Director 3.5% of Rev
KIRA DIXON-WEINSTEIN Board President
DANNY VINIK Board President
LUIS SOTO CARRILLO Secretary
JAMES THARP Treasurer
JOHN BURCHER Board Member
KAREN CHRISTENSEN Board Member
SAMUEL IRELAND Board Member
E COURTNEY JOHNSON Board Member
TABER MACCALLUM Board Member
DAN S MARTIN Board Member
JUSTIN MARTINEZ Board Member
JOANNE STUHR Board Member
WILLIAM RUSSO Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
31 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 9 other orgs in AZ with NTEE prefix A5.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 38 points below the peer median (0 vs. 38).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 34 → 31 over 5 years (declining by 3 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.