Governance Lag
Governance Lag
Governance Lag Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Governance Lag

What does this mean?

Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.

The Path Forward

The Scaffold

Brings immediate structural maturity. It represents the necessity of outside, independent oversight to manage new scale, breaking the echo chamber of a founding 'friends and family' board.

The Scaffold
The Scaffold
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Governance Lag
Overall
54
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
90
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Governance Lag

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 29.8% 54 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2023 48 Fragile Recovery
2022 46.5% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 45.7% 38 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2020 28.6% 40 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2019 47 Fragile Recovery
2018 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 47 Fragile Recovery
2016 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 47 Fragile Recovery
2014 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 43 Fragile Recovery
2012 39 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Craig Peterson Artistic Director 29.8% of Rev
Kevin Gardner Treasurer
John Page Board President
Jon Sywassink Secretary

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Craig Peterson Artistic Director 28.5% of Rev
Kevin Gardner Treasurer
John Page Board President
Jon Sywassink Secretary

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Carric Smolnik Artistic Director 20.7% of Rev
Kevin Gardner Treasurer
John Page Board President
Jon Sywassink Secretary

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Carric Smolnik Artistic Director 20.7% of Rev
Kevin Gardner Treasurer
John Page Board President
Jon Sywassink Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
90 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
54 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 118 other orgs in AZ with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 59 points above the peer median (90 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Governance Lag

Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 29.8% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~16 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.