Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

"Teaches and promotes ballet to children and youth, providing opportunities to learn, perform, and foster appreciation for the art of ballet."

— Statement of Program Service Accomplishments

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↓
Overall
41
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden — 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2022 — — — 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2021 — — — 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 — — — 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 — — — 45 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — — 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 — — — 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 — — — 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 — — — 42 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — — 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 — — — 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2012 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MEGAN GIRARD Board Member —
RICK SAGAR Board President —
ERIN WALSH-BEGUIN Board President —
TRACEY SCALZO Treasurer —
RAKELLE SPRINGMEYER Secretary —
KENT LAYTON Board President —
TRACI KING Board Member —
STACY SMITH Board Member —
MARC ROGERS Board Member —
AMY WOLFF Board Member —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RAKELLE SPRINGMEYER Secretary —
KENT LAYTON Board President —
TRACI KING Board Member —
STACY SMITH Board Member —
MARC ROGERS Board Member —
ROMA MORGAN Board Member —
AMY WOLF Board Member —
MEGAN GIRARD Board Member —
RICK SAGAR Board President —
ERIN WALSH-BEGUIN Board President —
TRACEY SCALZO Treasurer —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MEGAN GIRARD Board Member —
RICHARD SAGAR Board President —
ERIN WALSH-BEGUIN Board President —
TRACEY SCALZO Treasurer —
RAKELLE SPRINGMEYER Board Member —
KENT LAYTON Board President —
TRACI KING Board Member —
STACY SMITH Board Member —
ROMA MORGAN Secretary —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RICK SAGAR Board President —
ERIN WALSH-BEGUIN Board President —
TRACEY SCALZO Treasurer —
KENT LAYTON Board President —
TRACI KING Board Member —
STACY SMITH Board Member —
ROMA MORGAN Secretary —
STACY SMITH Board Member —
KENT LAYTON Board Member —
TRACI KING Board Member —
RICK SAGAR Board President —
ERIN WALSH-BEGUIN Board President —
TRACEY SCALZO Treasurer —
ROMA MORGAN Secretary —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
41 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 148 other orgs in AZ with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 28 points above the peer median (60 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).
  2. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.