Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↓
Overall
34
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 — — 8.7% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 — — 7.7% 48 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 10.3% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 — — 10.5% 36 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2019 — — 8.8% 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 — — 9.7% 40 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 — — 9.2% 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 — — 9.6% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2015 — — 10.6% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 — — 9.3% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 — — 10.2% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 — — 11.6% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JONATHAN STONE Executive Director 7.9% of Rev
KATHY BRYANT Board Member —
CALEB CORDASCO Board Member —
DUANE KOYAWENA Board Member —
DAVID KOERNER Board Member —
DORLEE HENDERSON Board Member —
MATT BEATY Board Member —
SHAYNE SMITH Board Member —
SUSAN BROWN Board Member —
JAMES HASAPIS Board Member —
JESSICA YOUNG Board Member —
PAUL MOORE Secretary —
STANLEY SUTHERLAND Treasurer —
KIMBERLY BATTY-HERBERT Board President —
RONALD BORKAN Board President —
JAMES HASAPIS Board President —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JONATHAN STONE Executive Director 7.3% of Rev
CALEB CORDASCO Board Member —
STANLEY SUTHERLAND Board Member —
KATHY BRYANT Board Member —
DUANE KOYAWENA Board Member —
SUSAN BROWN Board Member —
MATT BEATY Board Member —
SHAYNE SMITH Board Member —
MIKE PENCA Board Member —
DORLEE HENDERSON Board Member —
JESSICA YOUNG Board Member —
JAMES HASAPIS Board Member —
RON BORKAN Treasurer —
KIMBERLY BATTY-HERBERT Board President —
PAUL MOORE Secretary —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JONATHAN STONE Executive Director 6.4% of Rev
SUSAN BROWN Board Member —
MATT BEATY Board Member —
DORLEE HENDERSON Board President —
PAUL MOORE Board Member —
JILLIAN ASPLUND Board Member —
INGRID LEE Board Member —
TERRY MADEKSZA Board Member —
MIKE PENCA Board Member —
JESSICA YOUNG Board Member —
KARL EBERHARD Board President —
TODD SULLIVAN Board Member —
SUSIE GARRETSON Board Member —
RICH RUMMEL Board Member —
STANLEY SUTHERLAND Board Member —
KIMBERLY BATTY-HERBERT Board President —
KATHY BRYANT Secretary —
RON BORKAN Treasurer —
MICHAEL MARQUESS Board Member —
PAULA RICE Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
34 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 92 other orgs in AZ with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 73 points below the peer median (0 vs. 73).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 38 → 34 over 5 years (declining by 4 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.