Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2024 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2023 | Hidden | Hidden | — | 34 | Critical Intervention Needed | Recovery | |
| 2020 | — | — | — | 31 | Critical Intervention Needed | Stable Watch | |
| 2011 | — | — | — | 31 | Critical Intervention Needed | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2025
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janet Richter | Board President | — | ||
| Leslie Benner | Vice President | — | ||
| Linda Ingrassi | Secretary | — | ||
| Beth Dore | Board President | — | ||
| Joan Coombs | Board Member | — | ||
| Solitaire Dasher-Smiley | Board Member | — | ||
| DORA KOLKHORST | Board Member | — | ||
| Caroline Farkis | Board Member | — | ||
| Keo'vonne Wilson | Board Member | — | ||
| Robin Hintzen | Treasurer | — | ||
| Dora Kolkhorst | Board Member | — | ||
| Solitaire Dasher-Smiley | Board Member | — | ||
| LESLIE BENNER | Board President | — | ||
| JANICE SAUNDERS | Board President | — | ||
| DEE SAAGER | 2ND VICE PRE | — | ||
| PATSY KELLY | Treasurer | — | ||
| JANET RICHTER | RECORDING SE | — | ||
| JOAN COOMBS | Board Member | — | ||
| DORA KOLKHORST | Board Member | — | ||
| DYAN BUCCI | Board Member | — | ||
| LINDA INGRASSI | Board Member | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 119 other orgs in AZ with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: program score sits 27 points below the peer median (5 vs. 32).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
- Financial resilience score in the bottom quartile — reserves and liabilities ratios warrant review.
What would change this score
The two changes that would most improve this score:
- Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.