Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
49
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 44 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 52 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TRACY EVERS-WESTGERDES VICE PRESIDE
BRANDY JUTTE Secretary
HELEN LEFEVRE Treasurer
KAREN MEIRING Board President
KIM RAMMEL Board President

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TRACY EVERS-WESTGERDES VICE PRESIDE
BRANDY JUTTE Secretary
HELEN LEFEVRE Treasurer
KAREN MEIRING Board President
KIM RAMMEL Board President

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TRACY EVERS-WESTGERDES VICE PRESIDE
BRANDY JUTTE Treasurer
KAREN MEIRING Board President
KIM RAMMEL Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
49 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 213 other orgs in OH with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 15 points above the peer median (45 vs. 30).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 52 → 49 over 4 years (declining by 3 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.