Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
23
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
10
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 23 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 30 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 24 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SUSAN POWERS Board President
NANCY WILLIAMS Board President
HOLLY DAVIS Secretary
EILEEN STOYANOFF Treasurer
VIRGIL WIMMER Board Member
RACHEL LARKEY Board Member
MARY MCCOY Board Member
VAL EVANS Board Member
MICHAEL WEAVER Board Member
ALAURA BAILEY Board Member
LINDA HINCHEY Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SUSAN POWERS Board President
NANCY WILLIAMS Board President
HOLLY DAVIS Secretary
EILEEN STOYANOFF Treasurer
VIRGIL WIMMER Board Member
RACHEL LARKEY Board Member
LINDA HINCHEY Board Member
THERESA CHRIST Board Member
JOHN HARGROVES Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
VIRGIL WIMMER Board Member
DIRK MOORE Board Member
SUSAN POWERS Board Member
CHRISTINE MITTEN Secretary
JONATHAN DAVIS Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
10 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
23 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 28 other orgs in VA with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 24 points below the peer median (10 vs. 34).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 24 → 23 over 4 years (declining by 1 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.