Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
27
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 18.9% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2023 19.3% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 20.6% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 26.2% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 25.7% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 21.1% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 25.7% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2017 23.5% 43 Fragile Gov Risk
2016 18.1% 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 52 Fragile Recovery
2013 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2011 44.3% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Callie OBuckley Executive Dir. 18.3% of Rev
Lissa Garcia Lucht Board President
Kathie Shultz Board President
Lisa Adkins Treasurer
Susan Steffy Secretary
Lee Rand Board Member
Don O'Sullivan Board Member
David Rogers Board Member
Kirstin Smith Board Member
Callie OBuckley Kent Executive Dir.
Lissa Garcia Lucht Board President
Kathie Shultz Board President
Lisa Adkins Treasurer
Susan Steffy Secretary
Lee Rand Board Member
Don O'Sullivan Board Member
David Rogers Board Member
Kirstin Smith Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Andrea Cassutt Past Exec. Dir. 15.7% of Rev
Callie OBuckley Executive Dir. 3.5% of Rev
Susan J Kolokoff Interim ED 1.2% of Rev
Lissa Garcia Lucht Board President
Kathie Shultz Board President
Lisa Adkins Treasurer
Susan Steffy Secretary
Lee Rand Board Member
Don O'Sullican Board Member
David Rogers Board Member
Kirstin Smith Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Andrea Cassutt Past Exec. Dir. 19.9% of Rev
Sam Ritter Board President
Yolanda Colorado Board President
Mark Murdock Treasurer
Susan Steffy Secretary
Rebecca Ferber Board Member
Lee Rand Board Member
Doug Lynam Board Member
Rick Sanders Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
27 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 52 other orgs in NM with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 44 points below the peer median (0 vs. 44).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.