Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
48
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 12.6% 48 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 10.3% 48 Fragile Recovery
2021 13.9% 46 Fragile Recovery
2020 10.5% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 17.6% 23 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 12.9% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 14.1% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 14.0% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 6.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 29.4% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 10.3% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
EMMA MARZEN EXECUTIVE DI 7.0% of Rev
JOSHUA HABERMAN EX-OFFICIO D 5.5% of Rev
BARRY LYERLY Board President
DIANE GRAVES VICE PRESIDE
CATHY GRONQUIST Treasurer
FELICIA MORROW ASSISTANT TR
GREGORY DOVE Secretary
HON BARBARA J HOUSER ASSISTANT SE
CARMEN PARADIS Board Member
CATHY SICKLES Board Member
KATHRYN KING COLEMAN Board Member
FRASER MCALPINE Board Member
JEFFREY FORT Board Member
MURRAY BERN MD Board Member
PATRICIA STANLEY Board Member
SHERYL KELSEY PHD Board Member
STEPHEN HOCHBERG Board Member
SARA MCKENZIE Board Member
TOM CONNER Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
EMMA MARZEN EXECUTIVE DI 6.6% of Rev
EMMA MARZEN EXECUTIVE DI 5.8% of Rev
JOSHUA HABERMANN EX-OFFICIO D 4.3% of Rev
JOSHUA HABERMANN EX-OFFICIO D 3.9% of Rev
BARRY LYERLY Board President
JEFFREY FORT VICE PRESIDE
CATHY GRONQUIST Treasurer
GREGORY DOVE Secretary
CARMEN PARADIS Board Member
CHRIS FRENK Board Member
DIANE GRAVES Board Member
BARRY LYERLY Board President
FRASER MCALPINE Board Member
JEFFREY FORT VICE PRESIDE
JESSIE GROOTHUIS Board Member
CATHY GRONQUIST Treasurer
MURRAY BERN MD Board Member
GREGORY DOVE Secretary
PATRICIA STANLEY Board Member
HON BARBARA J HOUSER Board Member
SHERYL KELSEY Board Member
CARMEN PARADIS Board Member
STAN YEATTS Board Member
CATHY SICKLES Board Member
SUSIE WILSON DMA Board Member
DIANE GRAVES Board Member
SUZANNE TIMBLE Board Member
FRASER MCALPINE Board Member
WILLIAM MCARTHUR Board Member
MURRAY BERN MD Board Member
PATRICIA STANLEY Board Member
SHERYL KELSEY PHD Board Member
STEPHEN HOCHBERG Board Member
STAN YEATTS Board Member
SUSANNE TIMBLE JD Board Member
TOM CONNER Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
EMMA MARZEN EXECUTIVE DI 5.7% of Rev
JOSHUA HABERMANN EX-OFFICIO D 2.6% of Rev
BARRY LYERLY Board President
JEFFREY FORT VICE PRESIDE
CATHY GRONQUIST Treasurer
GREGORY DOVE Secretary
CARMEN PARADIS Board Member
CHRIS FRENK Board Member
ED BARKER Board Member
JESSIE GROOTHUIS Board Member
MURRAY BERN Board Member
PATRICIA STANLEY Board Member
SUSIE WILSON DMA Board Member
SUZANNE TIMBLE Board Member
WILLIAM MCARTHUR Board Member
KATHLENE RITCH EX-OFFICIO D
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
48 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 52 other orgs in NM with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 27 points above the peer median (60 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.