Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2024 | Hidden | Hidden | — | 62 | Governance-Stressed | Gov Risk | |
| 2023 | Hidden | — | — | 66 | Governance-Stressed | Recovery | |
| 2022 | Hidden | — | — | 62 | Governance-Stressed | Gov Risk | |
| 2021 | Hidden | — | — | 66 | Governance-Stressed | Gov Risk | |
| 2020 | Hidden | — | — | 66 | Governance-Stressed | Gov Risk | |
| 2019 | Hidden | — | — | 66 | Governance-Stressed | Gov Risk | |
| 2018 | Hidden | — | — | 66 | Governance-Stressed | Gov Risk | |
| 2017 | Hidden | Hidden | 2.0% | 69 | Governance-Stressed | Gov Risk | |
| 2016 | Hidden | Hidden | 2.0% | 69 | Governance-Stressed | Recovery | |
| 2015 | Hidden | Hidden | 3.7% | 65 | Governance-Stressed | Gov Risk | |
| 2014 | Hidden | Hidden | 3.7% | 65 | Governance-Stressed | Gov Risk | |
| 2013 | Hidden | — | — | 69 | Governance-Stressed | Gov Risk | |
| 2012 | Hidden | Hidden | 3.3% | 69 | Governance-Stressed | Gov Risk | |
| 2011 | Hidden | Hidden | 2.7% | 69 | Governance-Stressed | Recovery | |
| 2010 | Hidden | Hidden | — | 62 | Governance-Stressed | Gov Risk |
Officer compensation history
No IRS 990 Part VII compensation data available for this organization.
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 5 other orgs in NM with NTEE prefix A1.
Most-divergent component: program score sits 63 points above the peer median (100 vs. 37).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
What's driving this score
- Clements, Jamie holds 6 distinct authority roles, which creates concentration risk.
- Governance score is in the bottom quartile of the sector, typically driven by compensation concentration or related authority clustering.
What would change this score
The two changes that would most improve this score:
- Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.