Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
34
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 18.0% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 17.1% 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 12.1% 49 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KIMBERLY DOUCETTE Artistic Director 24.7% of Rev
LIANNA MAGGER Executive Director 23.9% of Rev
DAVID COLE Board President
JONATHAN WHITNEY Board President
TANYA KERNS Treasurer
JENNIFER CIPOLLA Secretary
MADDIE GELLER Board Member
JACINTH MCKENZIE Board Member
ELIZABETH LOCKMAN Board Member
KAREN KEGELMAN Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LIANNA MAGGER Executive Director 14.5% of Rev
DAVID COLE Board President
JONATHAN WHITNEY Board President
TANYA KERNS Treasurer
JENNIFER CIPOLLA Secretary
MARIANA SILLIMAN Board Member
DAVID FLEMING Board Member
MADELEINE BAYARD Board Member
ELIZABETH LOCKMAN Board Member
FARAN BRADY Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LIANNA MAGGER Executive Director 5.4% of Rev
JONATHAN WHITNEY Board President 0.1% of Rev
DAVID COLE Board President
TANYA KERNS Treasurer
JENNIFER CIPOLLA Secretary
MARIANA SILLIMAN Board Member
DAVID FLEMING Board Member
MADELEINE BAYARD Board Member
ELIZABETH LOCKMAN Board Member
FARAN BRADY Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
34 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 23 other orgs in DE with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 10 points above the peer median (45 vs. 35).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.