Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↓
Overall
39
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — — 39 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — 10.4% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 — — 12.4% 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 — — 14.7% 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 — — — 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BARBARA B KRUMDIECK EXECUTIVE DI —
JANE CAIN Board President —
THOMAS MILLER Board President —
CHARLES E LATHAM Treasurer —
MARY LATHEM Board Member —
MATT SHAUL Board Member —
PAUL KELLER Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BARBARA B KRUMDIECK EXECUTIVE DI 11.8% of Rev
THOMAS MILLER Board President —
JANE CAIN Board Member —
MARY LATHEM Board Member —
GEORGE BOHMFALK Board President —
CHARLES E LATHAM Treasurer —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BARBARA B KRUMDIECK EXECUTIVE DI 4.9% of Rev
FRANCIS BLAKER Artistic Director —
CHARLES E LATHAM Board Member —
GEORGE BOHMFALK Board Member —
THOMAS MILLER Board Member —
JANE CAIN Board Member —
MARY LATHEM Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BARBARA B KRUMDIECK EXECUTIVE DI 3.9% of Rev
THOMAS A MILLER Board Member —
RICHARD CARVER Board Member —
GEORGE BOHMFALK Board Member —
CHARLES E LATHAM JR Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
39 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 221 other orgs in NC with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 27 points below the peer median (25 vs. 52).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.