Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
54
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 4.1% 54 Fragile Recovery
2022 9.8% 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 2.5% 52 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JEREMY THOMAS Board Member 8.2% of Rev
GREG SHAYA Board President
CAMERON MANEESE Board President
SUZANNE HUSE Secretary
CATHY ROCHE Treasurer
MATTHEW CAMPBELL Treasurer
SANDRA HULL Board Member
CHRISTOPHER BUCHANAN Board Member
JEFF SMITH Board Member
LAURA NEILL Board Member
RODNEY MITCHELL Board Member
GUINEVERE STEENSON Board Member
RON HOLTMAN Board Member
KIM SEAMAN Vice President

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CAROLYN ROBINSON Executive Director 1.7% of Rev
GREG SHAYA Board President
KIM SEAMAN Board President
SUZANNE HUSE Secretary
JOHN COOK Treasurer
MATTHEW CAMPBELL Board Member
CAMERON MANEESE Board Member
SANDRA HULL Board Member
CYNTHIA PALMER Board Member
CHRISTOPHER BUCHANAN Board Member
JEFF SMITH Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
54 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 212 other orgs in OH with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 30 points above the peer median (60 vs. 30).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.