Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
85
Score
Governance
85
Score
Financial
80
Score
Program
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 40.2% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 27.2% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 25.2% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 24.9% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 26.9% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2018 25.7% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2017 30.3% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 49 Fragile Recovery
2015 45 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 51 Fragile Recovery
2013 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2012 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHRISTINE ROMAINE Executive Director 15.1% of Rev
Christine Romaine Board Member 9.8% of Rev
PAUL ROMAINE Artistic Director 9.1% of Rev
Paul Romaine Artistic Director 7.4% of Rev
JONATHAN ZIMMY Board Member 4.8% of Rev
DOMINIQUE EDSON Board Member 4.7% of Rev
PATRICK ALVAREZ Board Member 3.4% of Rev
Dominique Edson Board Member 3.0% of Rev
Jonathan Zimny Board Member 2.9% of Rev
Ann Bowar Executive Dir. 2.5% of Rev
Patrick Alvarez Board Member 2.2% of Rev
Bailey Hinkley Grogan Board Member 1.9% of Rev
ANN BOWAR Board Member 1.8% of Rev
Sandra Kilian Bookkeeper 1.3% of Rev
ALLISON YOUNG Board Member 1.0% of Rev
SANDRA KILIAN Board Member 0.3% of Rev
GROGAN HINKLEY Board Member 0.0% of Rev

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHRIS ROMAINE EXECUTIVE DIREC 14.3% of Rev
PAUL ROMAINE Artistic Director 6.9% of Rev
JOE ANDERIES Board Member
ANN BOWAR Board Member
VISDA CARSON Board Member
GREG KISHIYAMA Board Member
ADAM CHASNOW Board Member
JASON RUPE Board President
RASAM THILLAIRAJAH Board Member
ERIKA ENGER Board President
MATT LORAN Board Member
SONDA WYNN Board Member
JP TREMBLAY Treasurer
ADISA NICKERSON Board Member
JAKE ALVAREZ Secretary
NAIM MCKEE Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHRIS ROMAINE EXECUTIVE DIREC 12.1% of Rev
PAUL ROMAINE Artistic Director 7.5% of Rev
JOE ANDERIES Board Member
ANN BOWAR Board President
VISDA CARSON Board President
GREG KISHIYAMA Board Member
ADAM CHASNOW Board Member
JASON RUPE Secretary
LIAM GALLAGHER Board Member
ERIKA ENGER Board Member
MATT LORAN Board Member
SAMANTHA REISING Board Member
JP TREMBLAY Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PAUL ROMAINE Artistic Director 12.1% of Rev
CHRIS ROMAINE EXECUTIVE DIREC 7.3% of Rev
JOE ANDERIES Board Member
ANN BOWAR Board President
VISDA CARSON Board President
GREG KISHIYAMA Board Member
ADAM CHASNOW Board Member
JASON RUPE Secretary
LIAM GALLAGHER Board Member
ERIKA ENGER Board Member
MATT LORAN Board Member
SAMANTHA REISING Board Member
JP TREMBLAY Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
80 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
85 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
0 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
85 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,454 other orgs in US with NTEE prefix T7.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 0 points above the peer median (85 vs. 85).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.