Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
37
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 18.1% 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2023 Hidden Hidden 18.9% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 11.9% 39 Fragile Recovery
2021 21.0% 37 Fragile Recovery
2020 12.4% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 8.5% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 12.2% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 16.1% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 13.0% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 14.9% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 11.5% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 18.2% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2012 17.1% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ERIC LENTZ Executive Director 13.5% of Rev
LISA CAMERON Board Member 4.6% of Rev
DARYL WALKER Board Member
ILANA STEINBURG Board Member
BILL DAVIS Board Member
TONY HUERTA Board Member
DIANA BLACK Board Member
CAMERON HUDLEY-TAYLOR Board Member
CINDY KRAYBILL Board Member
KRISTIN MEROLLA Board Member
ELLEN GRAHAM Board President
CECILIA QUINTANILLA Board President
IAN LINDEMANN Treasurer
NISHANA JOHN Secretary
ADRIENNE JOHNSON Board President

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LISA CAMERON Board Member 10.3% of Rev
DARYL WALKER Board Member
ILANA STEINBURG Board Member
RACHELE ESPIRITU Board Member
DIANE CONAWAY Board Member
ELLEN GRAHAM Board Member
NISHANA JOHN Board Member
JESS KLOTSCHE Board Member
IAN LINDEMANN Board Member
CECILIA QUINTANILLA Board Member
SONIA GONZALEZ-ORTEGA Board Member
ADRIENNE JOHNSON Board President
LUCY O'SHAUGHNESSY Board President
JULIE ALMERIA Secretary
DIANA BLACK Treasurer

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LAURA GABBAY Executive Director 5.6% of Rev
LISA CAMERON Board Member 2.6% of Rev
ILANA STEINBERG Board President
DARYL WALKER Board Member
LUCY O'SHAUGHNESSY Board President
JIM MANIRE Treasurer
JULIE ALMERIA Secretary
DARLA DAKIN Board Member
ADRIENNE JOHNSON Board Member
JUDD CHOATE Board Member
DIANA BLACK Board Member
DIANE CONAWAY Board Member
RACHELE ESPIRITU Board Member
SONIA GONZALEZ-ORTEGA Board Member
ELLEN GRAHAM Board Member
NISHANA JOHN Board Member
JESS KLOTSCHE Board Member
IAN LINDEMANN Board Member
CECILIA QUINTANILLA Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LISA CAMERON Board Member 4.0% of Rev
LAURA GABBAY Executive Director 3.7% of Rev
ANDREW COX Treasurer
JIM MANIRE Treasurer
ILANA STEINBERG Board President
DARLA DAKIN Board Member
ADRIENNE JOHNSON Board Member
JULIE ALMERIA Secretary
JUDD CHOATE Board Member
LUCY O'SHAUGHNESSY Board President
ARIELLE RUBIN Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
37 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 182 other orgs in CO with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 28 points above the peer median (60 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.