Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
48
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 10.8% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 — — 11.7% 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 — — 10.7% 52 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 19.2% 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 — — 14.5% 48 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — 18.2% 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 — — 7.4% 44 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — 9.4% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — 5.0% 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 — — 12.5% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 — — 11.6% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2012 — — 15.0% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 — — 15.9% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CORINNE MELON Executive Director 11.8% of Rev
KATHERINE GRIER Board President —
ERIC NELSON Board President —
STACEY D'ANGELO Secretary —
COLLEEN MCCORMACK Secretary —
JOE BURGER Treasurer —
HEATHER COYLE Treasurer —
LISA BISULCA Treasurer —
WALTER BOOTH Board Member —
DENISE CAMERON Board Member —
DALE CAMPAU Board Member —
MICAH CASWELL Board Member —
MARK DISSETTE Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SASHA HUTCHINGS Executive Director 13.2% of Rev
STEVE BIRCHFIELD Board President —
KATHERINE GRIER Board President —
STACEY D'ANGELO Secretary —
COLLEEN MCCORMACK Secretary —
LISA BISULCA Treasurer —
DENISE CAMERON Board Member —
DALE CAMPAU Board Member —
ERIC NELSON Board Member —
KIM PABST Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SASHA HUTCHINGS Executive Director 11.5% of Rev
BEN RAANAN Artistic Director 4.9% of Rev
REGAN LINTON Artistic Director 2.7% of Rev
STEVE BIRCHFIELD Board President —
KATHERINE GRIER Board President —
JORDYN CAGNEY Secretary —
STACEY D'ANGELO Secretary —
COLLEEN MCCORMACK Secretary —
JACK VENABLE Treasurer —
LISA BISULCA Board Member —
DENISE CAMERON Board Member —
DALE CAMPAU Board Member —
KIM PABST Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SASHA HUTCHINGS Executive Director 11.1% of Rev
REGAN LINTON Artistic Director 6.3% of Rev
STEVE BIRCHFIELD Board President —
DENISE CAMERON OMBUDSMAN —
JORDYN CAGNEY Secretary —
JACK VENABLE Treasurer —
DALE CAMPAU Board Member —
STACEY D'ANGELO Board Member —
KATHERINE GRIER Board Member —
MARK LASSER Board Member —
KIM PABST Board Member —
JEFFREY PARKER Board Member —
LINDA PLAUT Board Member —
STEWART TUCKER LUNDY Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
48 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 270 other orgs in CO with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 28 points above the peer median (60 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.