Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
61
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
90
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 61 Stable Stable Watch
2022 58 Fragile Recovery
2021 54 Fragile Recovery
2020 50 Fragile Recovery
2019 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
FAYE KLESSIG Executive Director
MICHELLE HUSSEY Treasurer
DANA IRISH Board Member
MARK RAJKOVICH Board Member
ELISSA HOFFMAN Board Member
CAROLE RAJKOVICH Secretary
JONATHAN KOBS Board Member
APRIL LAWRENCE Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
FAYE KLESSIG Executive Director
MICHELLE HUSSEY Treasurer
DANA IRISH Board Member
MARK RAJKOVICH Board Member
ELISSA HOFFMAN Board Member
CAROLE RAJKOVICH Secretary
JONATHAN KOBS Board Member
APRIL LAWRENCE Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
FAYE KLESSIG Executive Director
MICHELLE HUSSEY Treasurer
DANA IRISH Board Member
MARK RAJKOVICH Board Member
ALYSSA HOFFMAN Board Member
CAROLE RAJKOVICH Secretary

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
FAYE KLESSIG Executive Director
MICHELLE HUSSEY Treasurer
DANA IRISH Board Member
MARK RAJKOVICH Board Member
ALYSSA HOFFMAN Board Member
CAROLE RAJKOVICH Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
90 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
61 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 103 other orgs in WI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 53 points above the peer median (90 vs. 37).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.