Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | — | — | — | 43 | Financially Distressed | Recovery | |
| 2023 | — | — | — | 29 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2022 | — | — | — | 40 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2021 | — | — | — | 36 | Financially Distressed | Decline Risk | |
| 2020 | — | — | — | 42 | Financially Distressed | Recovery | |
| 2019 | — | — | — | 43 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELENA SPENCER | Board President | — | ||
| KELLY ALISON CLARK | Treasurer | — | ||
| JENNIFER PARK | Board Member | — | ||
| JANA HEIBER | Board Member | — | ||
| JOEL BARD | Board Member | — | ||
| KATIE BRANDT | Board Member | — | ||
| AMY ALMEIDA | Board Member | — | ||
| SHANNON BROWNE | Secretary | — |
Tax year 2022
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JENNIFER PARK | Board Member | — | ||
| JOEL BARD | Artistic Director | — | ||
| JANA HIEBER | Board Member | — | ||
| ELENA SPENCER | Board President | — | ||
| KELLY ALISON CLARK | Treasurer | — | ||
| SHANNON BROWNE | Secretary | — |
Tax year 2021
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JENNIFER PARK | Board Member | — | ||
| JOEL BARD | Artistic Director | — | ||
| ELENA SPENCER | Board President | — | ||
| KELLY ALISON CLARK | Treasurer | — | ||
| SHANNON BROWNE | COO | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 222 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A2.
Most-divergent component: governance score sits 26 points below the peer median (50 vs. 76).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
Overall score has gone from 42 → 43 over 5 years (improving by 1 points).
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.