Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
29
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden 21.6% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 23.8% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2021 40.0% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 13.0% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Carrie Cacioppo Board President 12.8% of Rev
Robert Cacioppo DirectorPresident 8.9% of Rev
John Biffar Board Member
Denise Wheeler Wright DirectorSecretary
Sandy Stilwell Youngquist Board President
David Wright DirectorTreasurer
Dr Gerald Laboda DirectorChairman

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Robert Cacioppo DirectorPresident 5.6% of Rev
Carrie Cacioppo Board President 5.2% of Rev
Jon Finstrom Board Member
John Biffar Board Member
Denise Wheeler Wright DirectorSecretary
David Wright DirectorTreasurer
Dr Gerald Laboda DirectorChairman
Sandy Stilwell Youngquist Board President

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Robert Cacioppo DirectorPresident 2.2% of Rev
Carrie Cacioppo Board Member 2.2% of Rev
David Wright DirectorTreasurer
Dr Gerald Laboda DirectorChairman
Sandy Stilwell Youngquist Board President
Denise Wheeler Wright DirectorSecretary
Jon Finstrom Board Member
John Biffar Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
29 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 244 other orgs in FL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 30 points below the peer median (0 vs. 30).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 32 → 29 over 4 years (declining by 3 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.