Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2023 | Hidden | Hidden | — | 51 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2022 | — | — | 17.9% | 55 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2021 | — | — | 21.0% | 56 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2020 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2019 | — | — | — | 51 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2025
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Travis Wade | Executive Director | 30.7% of Rev | ||
| Patricia Simpson | Board President | — | ||
| Katie Wade | Secretary | — | ||
| Bonita Russell | Board Member | — | ||
| Michael Simpson | Board Member | — | ||
| Natalie Stewart | Board Member | — | ||
| Michael Wade | Board Member | — | ||
| Chuck McBride | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Travis Wade | Executive Director | 14.8% of Rev | ||
| Patricia Simpson | Secretary | — | ||
| Charles McBride | Board Member | — | ||
| Dan Dyer | Board Member | — | ||
| Michael Wade | Board Member | — | ||
| Katie Wade | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2022
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Travis Wade | Executive Director | 9.9% of Rev | ||
| Charles McBride | Board Member | 1.0% of Rev | ||
| Patricia Simpson | Secretary | — | ||
| Carol Duberowski | Board Member | — | ||
| Dan Dyer | Board Member | — | ||
| Michael Wade | Board Member | — | ||
| Katie Wade | Board Member | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 829 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 32 points above the peer median (65 vs. 33).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
What's driving this score
- No individual risk drivers stand out. Overall score reflects component balance, not any single signal.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.