Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
58
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
75
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 1.8% 58 Fragile Recovery
2023 51 Fragile Recovery
2022 19.2% 46 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RACHEL BODI Executive Director 1.6% of Rev
MORGAN PFEIFFER Board Member 0.2% of Rev
SARAH MAYER Treasurer
MAURA CALDWELL-THOMPSON Secretary
EUGENIA JONES Board Member
TORI LAWRENCE Board Member
SARAH BALLANCE Board Member
KATY BURANDA Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Rachel Bodi Executive Director 4.7% of Rev
Robert Poe Artistic Director 4.5% of Rev
Marcela Gomez Lugo Executive Assistant
Sarah Mayer Treasurer
Maura Caldwell Secretary
Eugenia Jones Board Member
Morgan Pfeiffer Board Member
Sarah Ballance Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Sarah Mayer Executive Director
Eugenia Jones Grant Writer
Maura Caldwell Secretary
Sarah Ballance Community Outreach
Morgan Pfeiffer Grant Writer
Rachel Bodi Artistic Director
Robert Poe Artistic Director
Sarah Mayer Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
75 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
58 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 104 other orgs in MO with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 37 points above the peer median (75 vs. 38).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.