Insufficient Data
At least 3 years of filing history are required to project a trajectory.
Insufficient Data
Market
Archetype
Mechanical
Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint
Insufficient Data
What does this mean?
Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.
Institutional Health Scores
Overall
47
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
65
Score
Program
15
Score
Title
-
Institutions
-
Avg Revenue
-
Risk Profile
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Insufficient Data
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2024 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2023 | Hidden | Hidden | — | 47 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2026
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chelsea Mulcahy | Board Member | 35.1% of Rev | ||
| Talia Bailes | Executive Director | — | ||
| Afsaneh Faki | Chief Financial Officer | — | ||
| Sydney LeSon | Board Member | — | ||
| Sydney Klau | Board Member | — | ||
| Fernanda Oliveira | Advisor | — | ||
| Cameron Mottley | Board Member | — | ||
| Sophie Savas | Board Member | — | ||
| Kaity Molito | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2025
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chelsea Mulcahy | Board Member | 33.4% of Rev | ||
| Talia Bailes | Executive Director | — | ||
| Afsaneh Faki | Chief Financial Officer | — | ||
| Grace Hageman | Board Member | — | ||
| Teagan Hill | Board Member | — | ||
| Fernanda Oliveira | Advisor | — | ||
| Kevin Swann | Board Member | — | ||
| Dominique Turner | Board Member | — | ||
| Eliza Steinman | Board Member | — | ||
| Kaity Molito | Board Member | — |
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown
Score breakdown
Financial resilience
65 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
47 / 100
Stable
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 49 other orgs in OH with NTEE prefix A2.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 23 points above the peer median (65 vs. 42).
5-year trend: Insufficient Data
Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.
What's driving this score
- No individual risk drivers stand out. Overall score reflects component balance, not any single signal.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.