Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
46
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
60
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 46 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 46 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 46 Fragile Recovery
2019 55 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LEWIS CAMERON KITCHIN Board Member 1,390.1% of Rev
CAROL EDMONDSON CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 433.1% of Rev
ANDREW DEWITT Board Member
MURRAY SINCLAIRE JR Board Member
MANUEL CHAVEZ III Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LEWIS CAMERON KITCHIN Board Member 1,261.5% of Rev
CAROL EDMONDSON CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 373.5% of Rev
ANDREW DEWITT Board Member
MURRAY SINCLAIRE Board Member
MANUEL CHAVEZ III Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LEWIS CAMERON KITCHIN Board Member 1,317.8% of Rev
CAROL EDMONDSON CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 445.4% of Rev
ANDREW DEWITT Board Member
MURRAY SINCLAIRE Board Member
MANUEL CHAVEZ III Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LEWIS CAMERON KITCHIN Board Member 1,251.1% of Rev
CAROL EDMONDSON CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 352.0% of Rev
ANDREW DEWITT Board Member
MURRAY SINCLAIRE Board Member
MANUEL CHAVEZ III Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
60 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
46 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 20 other orgs in OH with NTEE prefix A1.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 23 points below the peer median (5 vs. 28).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.