Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | — | — | — | 47 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2022 | — | — | — | 58 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2021 | — | — | — | 62 | Stable | Stable Watch | |
| 2020 | — | — | — | 60 | Stable | Decline Risk | |
| 2019 | — | — | — | 59 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2018 | — | — | — | 57 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KEITH RUBADUE | Treasurer | — | ||
| MELISSA HAGERMAN | Board President | — | ||
| KEITH RUBADUE | Treasurer | — | ||
| DESERAYE BATEMENT | Secretary | — | ||
| MELISSA HAGERMAN | Board President | — | ||
| JESSICA SPELMAN | 2ND VICE PRE | — | ||
| DESERAYE BATEMENT | Secretary | — | ||
| JOE TROXELL | VICE PRESIDE | — | ||
| JESSICA SPELMAN | 2ND VICE PRE | — | ||
| JOE TROXELL | VICE PRESIDE | — |
Tax year 2021
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KEITH RUBADUE | Treasurer | — | ||
| MELISSA HAGERMAN | Board President | — | ||
| DENISE CAMBIER | VICE PREISDE | — | ||
| JESSICA SPELMAN | Secretary | — | ||
| JOE TROXELL | 2ND VICE PRE | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 20 other orgs in OH with NTEE prefix A1.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 22 points above the peer median (65 vs. 43).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
Overall score has gone from 59 → 47 over 5 years (declining by 12 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.