Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
41
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 41 Fragile Recovery
2022 22.6% 47 Fragile Gov Risk
2021 53 Fragile Recovery
2020 38.6% 38 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2019 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 53 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NATASHA MAKHIJANI Board President 18.0% of Rev
SAMSUN VAN LOON Treasurer 18.0% of Rev
BERNADETTE MEYLER Secretary
BETTINA MUSSUMELI Board Member
DAVIDSON BIDWELL-WIATE Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SAMSUN VAN LOON Treasurer 44.3% of Rev
NATASHA MAKHIJANI Board President 24.9% of Rev
BERNADETTE MEYLER Secretary
BETTINA MUSSUMELI Board Member
DAVIDSON BIDWELL-WIATE Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SAMSUN VAN LOON Board Member 112.5% of Rev
NATASHA MAKHIJANI Board President 50.7% of Rev
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
41 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 829 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 27 points below the peer median (5 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.