Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
31
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2022 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 50 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TIM EPSTEIN Secretary
Board Member
PETER MARGASAK Treasurer
NICOLE MITCHELL Board Member
MICHAEL REED Board President
TOMEKA REID Board Member
Michael Reed Board President
Peter Margasak
Nolan Chin Production Manager
Margaret McCarthy Marketing Manager
Rob Frye Sound Technician

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Nolan Chin Production Manager 4.3% of Rev
Margaret McCarthy Marketing Manager
Robert Frye Sound Engineer
Cameron Croson Video Operator
Alyssa Martinez Marketing Manager
Brendan Youngquist Sound Engineer
Michael Reed Board Prresident
Peter Margasak Treasurer
Tim Epstein Secretary
Tomeka Reid Board Member
Nicole Mitchell Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
31 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 195 other orgs in IL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 31 points below the peer median (5 vs. 36).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 50 → 31 over 3 years (declining by 19 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.