Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
31
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden 24.3% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 17.2% 45 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 51 Fragile Recovery
2020 18.3% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 17.8% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MELODY DALE Board President 7.4% of Rev
ADRIANNA BROWN Board Member 1.4% of Rev
ELIZABETH PALMORE Board Member 1.4% of Rev
MACKENZIE NEWBURRY Board Member 0.7% of Rev
IMANI WULFF-COCHRANE Board Member 0.3% of Rev
KENDALL GILBERT Board Member 0.2% of Rev
CHERYL DALE Treasurer
DARLENE WULFF-COCHRANE Secretary

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MELODY DALE Board President 6.6% of Rev
MELODY DALE Board President 6.2% of Rev
CHELSEY HENDERSON Board Member 0.9% of Rev
RICHARD SCOTT Board Member 0.6% of Rev
IMANI WULFF-COCHRANE Board Member 0.3% of Rev
ADRIANNA BROWN Board Member 0.1% of Rev
DARIELLE LEMON Board Member 0.1% of Rev
CHERYL DALE Treasurer
DARLENE WULFF-COCHRANE Secretary
LYDIA QUARLES Board Member
MACKENZIE NEWBURRY Board Member
BRIANA HAYMAN Board Member
CHERYL DALE Treasurer
DARLENE WULFF-COCHRANE Board President
DANA PERRY Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
31 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 23 other orgs in DE with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 21 points below the peer median (15 vs. 36).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

Overall score has gone from 27 → 31 over 5 years (improving by 4 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.