Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | — | — | — | 47 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2022 | — | — | 23.3% | 32 | Critical Intervention Needed | Stable Watch | |
| 2021 | — | — | 49.1% | 30 | Critical Intervention Needed | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erin Tunbridge | Board Member | 16.8% of Rev | ||
| Erin Lunsford | Board Member | — | ||
| Dale Sekuler | Board Member | — | ||
| Nan Streicker | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2022
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jamie Carr | Dancer | 6.0% of Rev | ||
| Amanda Carlson Sturdevant | Dancer | 4.3% of Rev | ||
| Caroline Sharkey | Dancer | 3.6% of Rev | ||
| Kerry Healy | Dancer | 3.5% of Rev | ||
| Katherine Moore | Dancer | 3.3% of Rev | ||
| Brandon Welch | Dancer | 3.2% of Rev | ||
| Claire Fisher | Dancer | 1.4% of Rev | ||
| Audra Edwards | Dancer | 1.3% of Rev | ||
| Erin Tunbridge | Board Member | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 182 other orgs in CO with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 19 points above the peer median (55 vs. 36).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
Overall score has gone from 30 → 47 over 3 years (improving by 17 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.
What's driving this score
- Two consecutive years of deficit spending.
What would change this score
The two changes that would most improve this score:
- Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.