Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
25
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
10
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 0.0% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2021 23 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Dorota Czerner Secretary 0.0% of Rev
Russell Richardson Board Member 0.0% of Rev
Benjamin Boretz Board President
Leonard Easter Secretary

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Dorota Czerner-Richardson Secretary 0.1% of Rev
Richard Richardson Board Member 0.0% of Rev
Ben Boretz Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
10 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
25 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 24 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A9.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 34 points below the peer median (10 vs. 44).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.