Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
33
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 96.4% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 43.3% 44 Fragile Gov Risk
2021 48.2% 48 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RANDALL DODGE Artistic Director 55.4% of Rev
BRENDA DODGE Board Member 38.7% of Rev
ANGELA BIER Executive Director 2.3% of Rev
ALAN ALEKSANDROWICZ Treasurer
CANDACE DECKER Secretary
KARYN ELLIOT Board President
RANDALL DODGE Artistic Director
BRENDA DODGE Board Member
ANGELA BIER Executive Director
ALAN ALEKSANDROWICZ Treasurer
CANDACE DECKER Secretary
KARYN ELLIOT Board President

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RANDALL DODGE Artistic Director 45.6% of Rev
BRENDA DODGE Executive Director 28.5% of Rev

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RANDALL DODGE Artistic Director 28.9% of Rev
BRENDA DODGE Executive Director 26.7% of Rev
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
33 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 103 other orgs in WI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 18 points above the peer median (55 vs. 37).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 96.4% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~40 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.