Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
36
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
35
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 8.5% 36 Fragile Recovery
2022 7.0% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 50 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 46 Fragile Recovery
2019 45 Fragile Recovery
2018 35 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Devin Mahoney Executive Director 9.8% of Rev
Tim Schram Board President
Rego Marquiis Board President
Michael Gould Secretary
Ryan Miller Treasurer
Catherine McEnroe Board Member
Malik Johnson Board Member
Ellen Rainey Board Member
Sparkle Anthony Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Michael Gould Board Member
Devin Mahoney Board Member
Briana Mahoney Board President
Rego Marquiis Board President
Catherine McEnroe Board Member
Ryan Miller Treasurer
Malik Johnson Board Member
Tim Schram Board Member
Ellen Rainey Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Michael Gould Board Member
Briana Mahoney Board President
Devin Mahoney Board Member
Rego Marquiis Board President
Catherine McEnroe Board Member
Ryan Miller Treasurer
Al Schnier Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
35 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
36 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 699 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 5 points above the peer median (55 vs. 50).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 45 → 36 over 5 years (declining by 9 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.