Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
29
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
20
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2021 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 28 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 25 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
WEI-YANG LIN Board President
SHIH TUNG HSIN Treasurer
PEGGY CHIANG Secretary
NAN-CHENG CHEN Board Member
TIEN-HSIN WU Board Member
CHRIS HAN Board Member
KIM WANG-NEAL Board Member
JOYCE SOPHIA XU Board Member
ROBIN SHOEMAKER Board Member
KENNETH LI Board Member
JEEYOUNG KIM Board Member
WEI-YANG LIN Board President
SHIH TUNG HSIN Treasurer
PEGGY CHIANG Secretary
NAN-CHENG CHEN Board Member
TIEN-HSIN WU Board Member
CHRIS HAN Board Member
KIM WANG-NEAL Board Member
JOYCE SOPHIA XU Board Member
ROBIN SHOEMAKER Board Member
KENNETH LI Board Member
JEEYOUNG KIM Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
WEI-YANG LIN Board President
NAN-CHENG CHEN V.P.
SHIH TUNG HSIN Treasurer
PEGGY CHIANG Secretary
CHRIS HAN Board Member
KIM WANG-NEAL Board Member
JOYCE SOPHIA XU Board Member
CHARLIE CHEN Board Member
JEEYOUNG KIM Board Member
KENNETH LI Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
20 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
29 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 699 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 14 points below the peer median (15 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.